One should Vote-Who can deliver Prosperity & Dignity

Polls of 2014- Leaders endeavoring to fetch the requisite numbers, voters too are motivated towards extending support to those who represent honesty. The upcoming Lok Sabha polls are not the same as always. Anna’s movement against corruption, the gathering for ‘Damini’, and the rise of a new political group that alleges to be the most uncorrupt have definitely uplifted the political milieu. Leaders, for the very first time, are stressing the need to eradicate corruption. ‘Integrity’ is the factor that everyone is talking about. Is honesty the only aspect that can bring in the reforms and revolutions we are looking forward to? With a new group of people representing themselves as history-makers and the most sincere candidates, what shall be the approach of the voter? Remember, not everyone alleging to be God can be followed. Honesty is never through words, it calls for acts. Now, what shall the voters consider?

As declared by the Constitution, we have considered India as a secular and sovereign state that unites diverse religions, cultures, and communities- A fact we feel proud of. Along with defining and laying down the principles for the formation of the Government, our Constitution also defines the responsibilities of the elected Government. Prosperity of all is a part of this, which in turn calls for equivalent distribution of income, alike prospects of employment, and policies aimed at betterment of society as a whole. Shall we not consider India as an Economy then? – An economy that shall aim at maximizing profits and providing the dignity of being employed to all. Definitely, this shifts our basis of understanding to a distinctive ground. Will mere honesty-alleging candidates be competent enough in handling such a large-scale economy that is accountable to billions of citizens? Yes, we want to shut every door for corruption; however other vital factors shall too be paid heed to.

What should we expect from our political entrepreneurs? Vision, administrating capabilities, unbiased attitude, and swift decision-making potential can be the answer. This reminds me of the incidence when the nation was struggling from economic crisis in the 90s and the then Finance Minister, Dr. Manmohan Singh initiated liberalization of industries with a view to providing broader investment and capital prospects to privately-held ventures. The outcomes were surely favoring. Aptitude and ability to comprehend the global economic conditions are what make a leader an entrepreneur. As voters, we must consider the fact that we are a part of an economic society. Prosperity follows fiscal viability. The Constitution has recognized the vitality of employment and states that the dignity of every citizen is backed by the capability of earning livelihood. The status of being an economy is thus inseparable.

Should we then consider just the alleged-honest candidature, or shall we weigh our candidates on factors including intelligence, economical awareness, vision, and governance capability? Remember, governance is not that easy. The one, who is the most honest of all, can’t surely be the most capable administrator. Diplomacy is inseparable to leading. While we are part of a nation with multiplicities of castes, we also represent a nation that comprises of groups that look forward to perquisites without pains. The voters can with no trouble be influenced by promising materialistic benefits and policies favoring their particular community. The instability of past Union Governments is the outcome. The resultant outcomes are inflation, corruption, misuse of investigating agencies, and special packages to particular states. Voters, remember, we all constitute to build a nation and the prosperity of the nation would mean development of all.

Are we aware of the fact that private sector investment has dipped consistently since 2007, the figures of Sensex and Nifty aren’t promising, and the Indian currency reached its peak against U.S. Dollar a few months ago? Nomura, a prominent global financial institution, considers that the Modi-led Union Government in India would boom investments; the rupee would stand below 60 per dollar by June 2014; and the Gross Domestic Product of India will be above 6 percent in the financial year 2015-16. Though my words could be seen as favoring the Prime Ministerial candidate of the BJP, my sheer motive is to let voters recognize the urge of a stable economy. The voters, along with measuring the candidates on grounds of integrity, must also look forward to extending support to leaders that can bring in economic reforms at the earliest. Plus, never forget, governance demands sacrifices, diplomacy, and an unfair attitude at times. Administrating India is complex. The one who can deliver prosperity and dignity for all shall be voted for.

86 thoughts on “One should Vote-Who can deliver Prosperity & Dignity

  1. Amartya Ghoshe

    I don’t think Manmohan – Chidambaram – Pranab combination was a bad combination of leaders. But they didn’t perform. Despite the fact that Congress leaders were not fighting among themselves at least, like the BJP leaders. Also Arvind Kejriwal was supposedly a good leader. BUt look at the mess he created as soon as given a bigger role of Governance. Modi ji is supposedly a good leader and did good things with Gujrat. But look how he is failing to handle the fighting within BJP. Will he be able to handle allies in Govt.? You can trust nobody these days.

  2. Pingback: Nitin

  3. Pingback: Ankush

  4. Lal Chand

    Dear Sir, How does one find out the leaders who can deliver? Leaders are as good as their team. The current political system with multiple allies does not allow any Leader to perform efficiently.

  5. Pingback: P. J. Saxena

  6. Pingback: Anil

  7. Pingback: Suresh

  8. Pingback: Rakesh

  9. Pingback: Raman Kapur

  10. Pingback: D.K. Sinha

  11. Pingback: Ankit Arora

  12. Pingback: Mahender

  13. Pingback: Dinesh

  14. Pingback: Ajit

  15. Pingback: Rajeev

  16. Pingback: Ashok Saini

  17. Pingback: Peeyush Chawala

  18. Pingback: R.K. Rao

  19. Pingback: Ashish

  20. Pingback: Sheila

  21. Pingback: R. K. Chauhan

  22. Pingback: Sunil

  23. Pingback: J.P. Gupta

  24. Pingback: Hari Krishan

  25. Pingback: Sandeep

  26. Pingback: Mahendra

  27. Pingback: K.K. Tiwari

  28. Pingback: Avdhesh

  29. Pingback: Ashok Kansal

  30. Pingback: Rajeshwar

  31. Pingback: Venkatesh

  32. Pingback: Rajesh

  33. Pingback: C.J.S. Dhingra

  34. Pingback: Manoj

  35. Pingback: Surender

  36. Pingback: A. Bhattacharya

  37. Pingback: S.K. Sachdeva

  38. Pingback: M.N. Tayal

  39. Pingback: Virendra

  40. Pingback: Biswadip

  41. Pingback: Lokesh

  42. Pingback: Mukesh

  43. Pingback: Naresh

  44. Pingback: Rajeshwar

  45. Pingback: Manish Khurana

  46. Pingback: Pramod

  47. Pingback: G. Mohan

  48. Pingback: Rajesh

  49. Pingback: Atul

  50. Pingback: N.C. Tyagi

  51. Pingback: Ankush

  52. Pingback: Sumeet

  53. Pingback: R.V. Dutt

  54. Pingback: Ashok

  55. Pingback: Arshad

  56. Pingback: Avnish

  57. Pingback: Pramod

  58. Pingback: Nitin

  59. Pingback: Atul

  60. Pingback: N.C. Tiwari

  61. Pingback: Pawan

  62. Pingback: Mukesh

  63. Pingback: Sandeep

  64. Pingback: V.P. Nathan

  65. Pingback: Krishan

  66. Pingback: Sumeet

  67. Pingback: Kamaal

  68. Pingback: Mukesh

  69. Pingback: Jayant

  70. Pingback: Neeraj

  71. Pingback: Sandeep

  72. Pingback: Yogesh

  73. Pingback: Albert

  74. Pingback: V.P. Nathan

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *